There are just ads, billboards, and trash in the streets. The presidential election of 2024 are much more than a bad use of the money of the mexicans; the election will be one of the inflection points more important that our country has faced in the last few decades. In Mexico, there is a constant battle between ideas about the path I should take the country, some biased by passion, or, as they say, “by the algorithm for each one.
But beyond the passion of encouraging one and criticize other candidates do offer different visions that reflect not only the diversity of the policy, but also the reality that we will face us, the voters. In the middle of this ring and in the heat of the election, there are four pillars that we all need to understand well before you head out to vote on June 2: security, social benefits, education and economy.
Safety: The Dilemma of “Hugs, Not Bullets”
The security strategy of the present government, symbolized by the motto “hugs, not bullets”, is faced with the reality of the undeniable increase in the levels of violence. The need to re-evaluate this position is evident. Candidates such as Claudia Sheinbaum and Xóchitl Gálvez present differing proposals that illustrate this crucial point. While Sheinbaum bet for continuity, Xochitl proposes a “demilitarization” gradual in the country and a greater investment in the police and justice, marking a clear contrast with the vision of national security.
The evidence suggests that greater involvement of the military in the fight against crime, when it is carried out within the framework of respect for human rights, can be a vital tool. This is not only a question of confronting the criminals but also of restoring peace and security in communities besieged by violence.
Social benefits: Between Solidarity and Subsidiarity
In the debate on the social benefits, the principles of solidarity and subsidiarity must guide the way. Solidarity calls us to support those in vulnerable situations, while the subsidiarity emphasizes the help that allows people and communities to develop their capacity without creating dependency. Without a register clear of the beneficiaries, the social programs will continue to be used, as they have been in this administration, as a tool to buy votes instead of real engines of social change. The design and implementation of these programs should focus on empowering citizens, promoting their autonomy and active participation in society. Unfortunately, with a cut-out socialist of the two candidates, we do not see a proposal that point to the generation of opportunities on the division of our money.
Education: the Challenge of Artificial Intelligence
Education is another key front. In a world that is quickly transformed by artificial intelligence (AI), Mexico you should prepare their citizens for the challenges of tomorrow. The proposals that we continue to hear from 1999 to expand access to the internet and computers, though necessary, are not sufficient. Mexican education needs a vision that embraces AI, preparing students not only to use advanced technology, but also to understand it and, crucially, to innovate with it.
Economy: the Success of The Free Market and Capitalism
Finally, the economic model for the Mexico choose to travel will have a lasting impact. History has shown the success of the free market and capitalism in the promotion of economic development and the elevation of the standards of life. Yes, that capitalism represented by the so stigmatized neo-liberals and technocrats is the only one that guarantees the growth of the country.
However, we cannot continue to ignore the attack on the economic model. The construction of the International Airport Felipe Angeles (AIFA) and the cancellation of the airport in Texcoco are the best shows that Brown is not interested in, or liberties, or respect to the investment. With this symbol of authoritarianism initiated by the current government. In addition, although the dollars are relatively inexpensive, and this seems to be the only argument environment to economic success, the necessary, the type of change does not necessarily translate into an increase in purchasing power for the majority of mexicans. On the contrary, it may even be harmful, since a dollar cheaper may affect exports and, therefore, employment in key sectors of the economy.
In this environment, where it seems that very few are willing to change their opinions and preferences, and we should all question who really take you to Mexico and the mexican people on a path with a future. Candidates not we can expect a lot more of what we have already been given; it is now the responsibility is on us, and challenges us all, whether or not we are in agreement on how to address them.
English 
Spanish